Rudy Quan vs Noah Zamora Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Jun at 07:58 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Quan vs N. Zamora

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Quan 1 - 0 Zamora
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rudy Quan winning 2 and Noah Zamora winning 0. The last match between Rudy Quan and Noah Zamora was at the M15 Rancho Santa Fe, 20-06-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Rudy Quan getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Quan | 1 |
Zamora | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Rancho Santa Fe(06-20-25)
R. Quan vs N. Zamora H2H Profile
R. Quan vs N. Zamora Match Preview:
- Analyzing second serve success rates reveals that Quan has a slight advantage, winning 44.51% of these points compared to Zamora's 42.74%.
- Could this second serve advantage make a difference? Given its strong correlation with match outcomes, it certainly might.
- In terms of return game performance, Quan outperforms Zamora by winning 51.97% of points on their opponent's second serve, whereas Zamora wins 46.88%.
- Conversely, Zamora is more effective on first serve returns, winning 30.14% compared to Quan's 27.31%.
- When playing under pressure, Zamora excels in saving breakpoints with a 55.56% success rate, higher than Quan's 52.38%.
- Looking at overall match performance over the past year, Quan has won 60% of their matches, slightly leading Zamora who has a 54.55% win rate.
- Surfaces could play a crucial role: Zamora performs best on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, although Quan excels on hard courts winning 62% of the time.
- Zamora typically competes at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a win rate of 54.55%, while Quan participates in higher-tier Challengers/ITF events, though with a balanced win rate of 50%.
- How does the caliber of opponents affect these players? Zamora has faced higher-ranked average opponents (rank 186.45) compared to Quan's 257.6.
- In deciding sets, Quan demonstrates resilience with a 60% win rate, in contrast to Zamora, who has not won a deciding set in the last year.
- Regarding breakpoint opportunities, Zamora has a more effective conversion rate at 48%, whereas Quan converts 41.67% of breakpoints.
Editorial Prediction (June 20, 2025, UTC):
As we look toward the upcoming tennis match, several key statistics favor Quan over Zamora. Notably, Quan's superior performance in return games and a consistent edge in second serve points could prove decisive.
Zamora has demonstrated resilience under pressure with better breakpoint statistics and a strong indoor performance; however, these alone may not suffice against Quan’s slightly superior overall form and opponent handling capabilities.
The ability to win deciding sets gives Quan an advantage in close matches, possibly tipping the scales in their favor if the competition becomes intense.
Based on current data and performance patterns, Quan is the more likely winner in this matchup, leveraging better return stats and overall form against Zamora.
Rudy Quan vs Noah Zamora Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Quan vs N. Zamora H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 9 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
1:57:34 | Average Match Time | 1:57:34 |
69% (42/61) | 1st Serve % | 56% (44/78) |
69% (29/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (23/44) |
58% (11/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (19/34) |
38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
46% (36/78) | Return Points Win % | 34% (21/61) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Quan Recent Matches Played
N. Zamora Recent Matches Played

R. Quan vs N. Zamora Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56.16% (41/32) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.85% (28/24) |
54.44% (92/77) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.66% (66/57) |
51.42% (831/785) | Games Win/Loss | 50.08% (616/614) |
55.93% (33/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.19% (25/22) |
60.00% (6/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
50.00% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
36 | Aces Total | 83 |
0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
162 | Total Double Faults | 30 |
1:19:28 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
333.89 | Average Opponent Rank | 96.87 |
69% (2466/3572) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1072/1825) |
60% (1474/2466) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (679/1072) |
46% (506/1106) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (379/753) |
47% (210/443) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (74/180) |
45% (1602/3538) | Return Points Win % | 40% (710/1772) |
50.00% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
50.00% (8/8) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
58.18% (32/23) | Futures W/L | 53.85% (28/24) |
56% (41/73) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (28/52) |
69% (11/16) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 71% (10/14) |
57% (13/23) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (9/19) |
94% (36/34) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 74% (27/20) |
6% (36/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 26% (27/7) |
19% (37/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 32% (25/8) |